By Gabriel Piterberg
Within the area of six years early within the 17th century, the Ottoman Empire underwent such turmoil and trauma--the assassination of the younger ruler Osman II, the re-enthronement and next abdication of his mad uncle Mustafa I, for a start--that a student mentioned the period's three-day-long dramatic climax "an Ottoman Tragedy." lower than Gabriel Piterberg's deft research, this era of difficulty turns into a historic laboratory for the background of the Ottoman Empire within the 17th century--an chance to watch the dialectical play among historical past as an incidence and event and background as a recounting of that have. Piterberg reconstructs the Ottoman narration of this fraught interval from the foundational textual content, produced within the early 1620s, to the composition of the nation narrative on the finish of the 17th century. His paintings brings theories of historiography into discussion with the particular interpretation of Ottoman historic texts, and forces a rethinking of either Ottoman historiography and the Ottoman nation within the 17th century. A provocative reinterpretation of an immense occasion in Ottoman heritage, this paintings reconceives the relation among historiography and historical past.
Read or Download An Ottoman Tragedy: History and Historiography at Play PDF
Best turkey books
Initially released in 1962 via the Princeton collage Press.
my test at three hundred dpi, OCR'd and bookmarked
Because the early 20th century the resident embassy has been alleged to be dwelling on borrowed time. by way of an exhaustive old account of the contribution of the British Embassy in Turkey to Britain's diplomatic courting with that country, this ebook exhibits this to be fake. half A analyses the evolution of the embassy as a operating unit as much as the 1st global conflict: the structures, diplomats, dragomans, consular community, and communications.
During this booklet, Umut Uzer examines the ideological evolution and transformation of Turkish nationalism from its early precursors to its modern protagonists. Turkish nationalism erupted onto the area level within the past due 19th and early 20th centuries, as Greeks, Armenians, and different minority teams in the Ottoman Empire started to search independence.
- The Construction of Authority in Ancient Rome and Byzantium: The Rhetoric of Empire
- Autonomy and Dependence in the Family: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective (Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul)
- Ottoman High Politics and the Ulema Household
- The Ottoman Middle East: Studies in Honor of Amnon Cohen (Ottoman Empire and Its Heritage)
- Bandits and Bureaucrats: The Ottoman Route to State Centralization (The Wilder House Series in Politics, History and Culture)
- Turkey Beyond Nationalism: Towards Post-Nationalist Identities (International Library of Twentieth Century History)
Additional resources for An Ottoman Tragedy: History and Historiography at Play
The third observation concerns the sociology of the Ottoman historians. ” 2 It would be erroneous to interpret, both contextually and textually, the Tarih-i Al-i Osman genre of the early seventeenth century as a linear progression from its ﬁfteenth-century putative predecessor or as merely an “improvement” of it. The fourth and ﬁnal observation alludes to modern scholarship. Two main trends, which are not mutually exclusive and may be found within a single study, are concurrent in the scholarship on Ottoman historiography.
Whatever the judgment passed on him, Mustafa Ag˘a’s involvement highlights another facet of the changes in the royal household at that period: the dramatic ascendancy of the black eunuchs in general and the chief black eunuch in particular, frequently in conjunction and alliance with the valide sultan. This ascendancy should be understood within the underlying framework of the transformation of the state and the royal household described above. The Ottomans were not the ﬁrst to recruit and employ eunuchs— black or white—in their households: they were preceded by numerous Mediterranean states all the way back to antiquity.
Instances of parsimoniousness and an arbitrary attitude as a major cause for the kul’s resentment abound. The importance of performing certain rituals that demonstrated imperial largesse as well as acknowledgment of the kul’s commitment and effort were central to keeping the relationship harmonious. 32 Tug˘i’s pro-kul predilection notwithstanding, this discursive and material context explains why the kul’s contention in his text, that the behavior of Sultan Osman had justiﬁed their lackluster performance, not only was not considered a priori preposterous but could actually make sense.